Picture
_ Last week the CBC aired their "Lousy Labels" Marketplace episode as it related to food.  If you were shocked and perhaps outraged to discover that the ingredient "cultured celery extract," that is now found in different brands of deli meat that are marketed as "natural" and "preservative free," contains nitrites you are not alone. 

Check out the article "'Natural' deli meats may not be as healthy as you think" that was published in the Globe and Mail well before the Marketplace episode aired. The information is accurate and compelling and may make you think twice when shopping for deli meats. 

What both the Marketplace episode and Globe and Mail article did not expose however, is that there are other ways that preservatives containing nitrites and nitrates can be hidden on food labels in Canada. Chapter eight of
'Read it with a Grain of Salt', being launched this May 2012, will reveal the information you need to empower yourself to make more informed and healthful choices while shopping! 
 
Written by: Allison Jorgens - "Read it with a Grain of Salt"  © 2012, Ontario, Canada

 
 
Picture

Chocolate milk is one of those drinks that many of us consider to be a guilty pleasure (myself included), and I'm sure it's not a stretch to say we have all tried to convince ourselves at one time or another that it's better to drink chocolate milk vs no milk at all. This week I decided to treat myself to a one litre carton of chocolate milk (something I only do once or twice a year) and noticed that the carton displayed the claim "Low in Cholesterol" on the front of the label. 


The Facts!
  • The product I bought was made with 1% partly skimmed milk which, as per the Canadian Nutrient File, contains 13 mg of cholesterol per 1 cup (250 mL) serving.  
  • The Canadian Nutrient File confirms a cholesterol value of 8 mg per 1 cup (250 mL) serving for chocolate milk made with 1% partly skimmed milk.
  • The chocolate milk I bought and the carton of 1% partly skimmed milk I had in my fridge both declared a rounded cholesterol value of 10 mg per 1 cup (250 mL) serving.
To make the claim "Low in Cholesterol" a food must:
  • Contain 20 mg or less of cholesterol per reference amount (250 mL) and per the serving size stated on the nutrition facts table on the label (250 mL).
  • Meet the conditions for the claim "Low in Saturated Fat"[1], which requires that the food contains 2 g or less of saturated fat and trans fat combined per reference amount (250 mL) and per the serving size stated on the nutrition facts table on the label (250 mL). 
  • Provide 15% or less energy from the sum of saturated fat and trans fat[2]
The Skinny on Chocolate Milk:

Believe it or not, chocolate milk has a standard prescribed in the Food and Drug Regulations (B.08.016), which means it must meet specific requirements. In addition to a flavouring preparation (in this case cocoa and artificial flavour), a sweetening agent (e.g. sugar, invert sugar, glucose syrup, etc.), and vitamin D, it may also contain:
  • Salt
  • Colours (natural and/or artificial colours)
  • Lactase (an enzyme)
  • A stabilizing agent (such as carrageenan, acacia gum, carob bean gum, and locust bean gum)
  • Starch
  • Not more than 50,000 total aerobic bacteria per cubic centimetre. 
Translation Please!

A bit of a technical explanation I know, but what it means is that the Canadian Nutrient File data, as well as the information displayed on the chocolate milk label I bought, and the 1% partly skimmed milk label I had in my fridge, all meet the requirements to display the claim "Low in Cholesterol". 

Also, none of the mandatory or optional ingredients that are added to chocolate milk products contain cholesterol. Therefore, the only source of cholesterol in 1% partly skimmed milk is the milk and it appears based on Canadian Nutrient File data, and cholesterol values declared on 1% partly skimmed milk products on the market, that the amount of cholesterol does not surpass 13 mg per 1 cup (250 mL) serving, which is well within the "Low in Cholesterol" requirements.

So Why is this Claim Misleading?


Although the chocolate milk meets the requirements of what Health Canada defines as a "Low in Cholesterol" food, all chocolate milk currently on the market also meets these requirements, and therefore it is misleading to imply this product offers a health benefit over a competitive brand. If you saw this product beside a different companies product that did not display a "Low in Cholesterol" claim, chances are you would naturally gravitate to the label that highlights a health benefit. 

How the Claim should have been Displayed!

Because all 1% partly skimmed chocolate milk products on the market will inherently be low in cholesterol, the claim "Low in Cholesterol" must be further qualified with a statement such as "all 1% partly skimmed chocolate milk is low in cholesterol"[3] . The claim, therefore, should have read:
  • "Low in Cholesterol - all 1% partly skimmed chocolate milk is low in cholesterol".
Empower Yourself!

1. Don't fall victim to claims that try to deem one product to be superior in terms of healthfulness or quality over another. Always refer to the list of ingredients and nutrition facts table for the facts.  It's possible that although this claim was truthful and the product was in fact low in cholesterol, a competitive brand, that was also low in cholesterol, may also have been lower in sugars and/or contained less additives. 

2. Try not to choose foods based on one criteria (e.g. amount of cholesterol, number of calories, amount of fat, etc.). You probably wouldn't buy a car based solely on the paint colour and you shouldn't choose foods based on a single attribute either. Try considering the entire composition of the product; which nutrients are you concerned with (it typically isn't just one), are there any ingredients you are trying to avoid?
If the product doesn't meet your own personal criteria for healthful leave it on the shelf!

[1] & [2] Health Canada's Food and Drug Regulations, Table Following B.01.513, Items 19 & 28. 
[3] Health Canada's Food and Drug Regulations, B.01.511(4)

Written by: Allison Jorgens - "Read it with a Grain of Salt"  © 2012, Ontario, Canada
 

Welcome!

02/02/2012

0 Comments

 
Picture
Welcome to the Read it with a Grain of Salt blog!  I am thrilled that you have decided to join me on my mission to help decode Canadian food labels for consumers from an insider’s perspective, and hope that the information I share will empower you with the knowledge and awareness needed to make more healthful and informed choices.

The book, website and blog are not about preaching what you should or should not eat, and are not about giving you health or nutrition advice, but rather, they are about teaching you how to understand the information and misinformation on prepackaged processed food labels so that you are better equipped to make the decisions that are right for you.

Although I will not be exposing actual product and company names on my website or in my book, I can confirm that the products that I am highlighting can in fact be found at the present time in grocery stores in Canada. 


I hope it will amaze and perhaps even shock you to find out how much you may not know about the foods you have been eating all your life!



Written by: Allison Jorgens - "Read it with a Grain of Salt"  © 2012, Ontario, Canada

 
    _ Author:

    Allison Jorgens is a home economist holding a degree in nutritional sciences. She has been working as a food label specialist for grocers and food manufactures in Canada for nearly a decade. Over the past ten years, Allison has reviewed thousands of food labels for many of Canada’s leading private-label grocery brands, large and small manufacturers, distributors, and a variety of importers. It is this wide-ranging experience in regulatory-compliance label reviews that makes her knowledge unique—and her perspective all the more shocking. As a concerned parent and advocate of leading a healthful lifestyle, Allison recommends that all responsible consumers empower themselves with the knowledge needed to make more healthful and informed choices.

    Archives

    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012